G400 and Quake 3
Why does dual head matter?
Now, this dualhead business may or may not be impressive at first, but it also has implications for gaming. Matrox had a demonstration of a flight simulator running that supported dual displays. On one monitor was the usual in-game cockpit view of a plane in flight. On the second monitor the game displayed two windows - one showed a map of the flight plan the plane was on and the second showed a third person camera of the plane in flight! Such technology could have real implications for other games as well. I can imagine an RTS where the “mini map” isn’t so mini anymore. Seeing how expensive displays are, it probably isn’t likely to catch on and proliferate that well though.
![Firingsquad's E3 Summary [ Expendable with bump mapping @ 550 x 413 ] > View Full-Size in another window.](images/e-s.jpg) Expendable with bump mapping
|
G400 and Quake 3
Bah bah, technology, how well does it play Quake 3? Matrox did have one station set up with Quake 3 test (purportedly an older build than the one everyone else has) setup. The board was a G400 Max I think (someone told me G400 regular, another person told me G400 Max), powered by a P3 500. The box was running Quake 3 at 1024 x 768 with 32 bit color and everything on. I was pleased to see that it ran at a very playable framerate. When they weren’t looking I turned on cg_drawfps and noticed that the rate hovered right around 30-40 fps or so. Interpolating from Brian Hook’s framerate tests, I could tell that at the very least, the G400 Max will be competitive with the Voodoo 3 and TNT2 in terms of frame rates. It's too bad that the machine was not hooked up to another Q3 machine - it's the battles where the real stress testing takes place.
![Firingsquad's E3 Summary [ And without bump mapping @ 550 x 413 ] > View Full-Size in another window.](images/f-s.jpg) And without bump mapping
|
Open GL with the card
Matrox representatives stressed that a full Open GL ICD would ship with the card, and that the one I was looking at was merely a beta. My take is that if they can make even further framerate improvements to what I saw, then there’s no doubt in my mind that the G400 Max will be a legitmate competitor with 3dfx and NVIDIA’s offerings. With the added value of environmental bump mapping and dual head technology, it's logical for people to start taking Matrox seriously as a real giant in the 3D gaming industry.