FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Games : First Person Shooter : Battlefield 1942 Review
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 


Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
Tony Hawk's Project 8 Preview Screenshots [30] (3)


Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare SP Review (prelim 2) (7) by jacobvandy
The Bland Addiction: World of Warcraft (16) by Discobiscuits
Desperation (0) by stalker_loner
Defense of the Ancients Review (Warcraft III Map/Mod) [Preliminary #2] (6) by Discobiscuits
UT3 anyone ;0 (0) by DEsanitE
Fury - The PvP Exclusive MMO? (2) by imoish
C&C:Renegade Review, wrist-slittingly good! (8) by McStu
S.T.A.L.K.E.R Screenshot - An Artistic Touch (1) by sushrukh
Guild Wars Gets a Bad Review (9) by Joluha
Don't Shoot! (0) by L10nhardt

More Blogs >>




Battlefield 1942 Review
September 29, 2002   Jakub Wojnarowicz > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | User Reviews(1) | Article Images(51) | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
Gameplay

Eat hot lead

Battlefield 1942 is a blast, the kind that comes from the 16” shells that the USS Missouri hurls. It’s like the 'merely' great multiplayer from RtCW was taken and refined to excellence. Truthfully, after playing the game, ones comes to the conclusion that there is no finer activity in life but to log on and lob some bombs at an IJN carrier or put a hole in the side of a T-34/85 with a Tiger’s 88mm.

Even when no one co-operates together, we had no problems finding fun. It’s as rewarding to jump into an AA gun on a carrier and feed flak up to the flyboys as it is to sneak around with a sniper rifle, or lob hot lead from a tank. Maps are generally balanced, and even an inferior team can win by the use of superior strategy. Any balance problems can by server admins through changing the ticket values, giving one side more or less to compensate. While it is no Tribes, we can see BF1942 lending itself to hardcore play. The maps are a bit too large for effective teams, since bringing 16 people together (plus reserves) is much harder than getting eight friends to join you for some havoc.

Battlefield 1942 Review [ Kursk @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Kursk

Battlefield 1942 Review [ Take a car and drive it into a tank @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Take a car and drive it into a tank

Battlefield 1942 Review [ Or just take a tank @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Or just take a tank


Conquest mode is where the game really shines, in fact it is usually the only way worth playing. Capture the Flag works on some maps, but a match on Berlin can go for hours without either side getting a score. While the other modes do work, it is clear that no compromises were made to the play in Conquest.

Problemo?

Singleplayer, if you haven’t guessed yet, is a joke. The campaign mode is little more than playing the maps through in a series until you beat them. AI suffers from Daikatana syndrome. On the one hand, the things that the bots accomplish are really rather amazing. They fly, they snipe, they run and gun, they can pilot tanks and ships. On the other hand, they’re totally unnatural and blatantly stupid at times. When on your team, they can be as stupid as Superfly and Mikako from Daikatana. When opposing you, they’re generally smarter and get the kind of aim that gets the Q3A bots on Nightmare mode jealous. Either way, they are completely artificial and show none of the ‘life’ that bots in UT displayed.

Battlefield 1942 Review [ Purty water @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Purty water

Battlefield 1942 Review [ I wonder when he'll notice @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
I wonder when he'll notice

Battlefield 1942 Review [ Laying mines down @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Laying mines down


The performance of the game is horrible. In singleplayer, the bots can slow a computer down to a crawl. In multiplayer, it is usually the server’s fault. Everyone and their mother has at least a 24-player server, but only about one in three of those can actually run decently at that speed. The others suffer from lag that ranges from spiky (like when making high-speed maneuvers in a vehicle) to unbearable. With the official EA servers out of the equation, the ratio gets much worse. To make matters worse, a good 25% of all servers are passworded, seemingly 24/7, always with 0 players. Why host a server if you’re not going to let people play on it? We already mentioned the rather heavy system requirements.



Back! Toys for boys     Load your guns Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
I am an AMD AgentRead this Media-Blog entry!» Guild Wars Gets a Bad Review (9)
by Joluha (4) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 7 months ago

Sponsored Links
:
[GO]


 Latest Headlines
Win a Complete Crossfire System! (4)
Activision merger with Vivendi approved, deal closes tomorrow (5)
Sony releases 2.41 PS3 update (7)
More EA-Take-Two Developments (2)
Rock Band Continuing to Add DLC Crap (2)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


 Random Fact
Funniest. T-shirt. Ever. (Remember girls, this does work both ways.)

PSD to XHTML  Online Loans  Cheap computers  Cheap Magazines  Free screen savers
FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2008 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved