FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Features : Articles : Windows XP Performance
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 


Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
RAGE SIGGRAPH 2009 Screenshots [7] (0)

T-Shirts! (0) by Skippy989
See Green (4) by mikearmour
C&C:Renegade Review, wrist-slittingly good! (8) by McStu
PC in a world of Crysis (3) by greennova
OverClocking Boot Camp (3) by Odoyle721
Fury - The PvP Exclusive MMO? (3) by imoish
13.1 miles of EVGA (0) by Odoyle721
Getting The Most Out of Your AMD CPU (2) by Deux
War! Huh! Yeah! (aka Blatant Plagiarism) (1) by ICDP
Meditation of a Tyranid (0) by Aftermath

More Blogs >>




Windows XP Performance
November 02, 2001   Sarju Guido Shah > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | User Reviews | Article Images | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
Introduction

Oh the numbers

We've already posted our review, and we've already posted some tweaks you can do to get your new XP system up and going. Now we're finally posting the one thing you guys probably wanted to see first - the numbers. Raw data on how this puppy performs.

XP - Our settings

If you haven't looked at our review of WinXP or the quick setup guide, you might not know that XP has quite a few toys hidden beneath its hood. There are tons more settings to be tweaked with, than with previous versions of Windows.

For testing purposes, we have to set standards on how the OS will be setup. For our tests, we are disabling System Restore, as the computer will most likely think that nothing is happening at the most inopportune moments, thus ruining any hope of getting consistent numbers within a reasonable period of time. We chose to leave all the eye-candy of the OS on, as we don't know what the majority of our readers will do, so in essence, we have a worst case scenario result - the numbers can only get better once we disable all the foofy parts. Most of the other settings within XP have been left alone, although we did take the bit depth down to 16-bit in our tests.

XP testing procedures

When operating our testbeds with the older OSs, there hasn't been much to worry about. Prior methodology required us to install the OS, install the drivers and then run the benchmarks as we would any program. With the advent of XP, our usual testing procedures developed a little kink. Microsoft actually has a section on their website explaining how to run tests on XP. It seems that WinXP has some interesting disk caching, or disk arrangement, features that run in the background. The purpose of these tasks is to speed up the programs you use on a daily basis. This is akin to the way defrag works, only these processes startup whenever you aren't doing anything on your computer.

    What's that about cycles? Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
I am an AMD AgentRead this Media-Blog entry!» DoW II 5-7-5, and the Limerick (1)
by jarrodthome (61) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 5 months ago


 Hottest Topics
Iwata admits the 'Wii has stalled' (50)
Modern Warfare 2 PC limited to 9v9 matches (26)
Are multi-console gamers shifting from 360 to PS3? (24)
RAGE won't support dedicated servers either (22)
Borderlands PC Review (19)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


 Quick Plug
Stay tuned for our followup on the ATI Radeon 8500 Benchmarking Ethics article!


FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2009 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved