FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Guides : Articles : How It Works: Display Adapters Part III
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 



Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
Neverwinter MMORPG May 2012 Screenshots [27] (0)

[FX] 3-Screen Effect - Guide (part-4) (0) by nGAGE
Crankin' it up today... and tomorrow! (8) by Slipdisk
[FX] 3-Screen Effect - Guide (part-3) (0) by nGAGE
Crank that SH#!t Up Contest Entry (10) by Boltshot
CRANG That S#!T Up! (15) by ElwinRansom
[FX] 3-Screen Effect - Guide (part-1) (0) by nGAGE
Crank That PhysX UP! (10) by mohawkade
The Nvidia "Crank That S#!T Up" Quiz Show, Part 2 (6) by mohawkade
[FX] 3-Screen Effect - Guide (part-2) (0) by nGAGE
ENTRY FOR CONTEST (4) by Alexander470

More Blogs >>




How It Works: Display Adapters Part III
July 19, 2000   Chris Buck Buccola > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | User Reviews | Article Images(9) | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
PGA, PS/2 and XGA

Professional Graphics Adapter (PGA)

The PGA display adapter was introduced in 1984 alongside the EGA adapter. With a selling price of over $4,000, the PGA was aimed directly at the high-end business market. The PGA was the first processor based graphics card, containing its own Intel 8088 processor which controlled all video related tasks.

The entire PGA package contained a special PGA display monitor, and the graphics card set, which when fully expanded, took up three system expansion slots. While the set cost a great deal of money, its ability was impressive, offering full 60 fps of 3 dimensional rotation and clipping. This system was geared for engineering and scientific uses, but was ousted in favor of the VGA system, which gained support due to heavy OEM presence in the market.

PS/2 display systems

In 1987, IBM threw a few new, but related video adapters on the market: the 8514/A, the multicolor graphics Array (MCGA) and the all-familiar Video Graphics Array (VGA) that we still use today. The 8514/A and the MCGA offered slightly better ability than VGA, but were for use only on PS/2 model MCA (Micro Channel Architecture) bus systems. The 8514/A could operate with a standard VGA monitor, but it could only operate in its highest resolutions and color depth when paired with an 8514 display. The MCGA adapter was a lower cost version of the 8514/A. However, at this time, IBM encountered heavy resistance in the industry towards adoption of its new MCA bus. This happened because IBM insisted on charging a licensing royalty for third party companies to develop and build systems and components for the MCA system.

While the industry scoffed at IBM, Compaq and a small cadre attempted to push a new bus, called the EISA, which never took off. Shortly thereafter, the VL-Bus (Vesa Local Bus) was introduced, mainly seeing use in 486 class computers. Intel then introduced the PCI bus with the release of the second generation Pentium Classic.

Extended Graphics Array (XGA and XGA-2)

It wasn't too long before IBM dropped support for the 8514/A, MCGA, along with the VGA standard to introduce their new XGA display, which debuted in late 1990. XGA was grown out of a combination of the 8514/A and VGA technology, using the same 15 pin HD-15 connector. As is expected of new technologies, it was not compatible with the older VGA standard, or VGA display monitors. XGA was used only on IBM model PS/2 computer systems, and required an XGA monitor to operate. You could physically attach an XGA monitor to a VGA graphics card, or vice versa, but the display would be skewered, and not work correctly.

The primary difference between XGA and VGA was that XGA was a co-processor based adapter, while VGA was an accelerator-based adapter. XGA was overall more capable than VGA, but the two were incompatible with each other. Since contained it's own processor, the XGA was capable of operating completely independent of the systems' CPU, not requiring any external direction in order to do its job. The XGA-2 essentially just increased the resolution, color depth and refresh rates supported by the XGA adapter. XGA was capable of up to 1024X768 resolution, and had a 65,536 (16-bit) color palette, but only reached 16 bit color at 640x480. At 1024X768 resolution it was restricted to 256 colors. A minimum of 1MB of local video RAM was required to operated the XGA in both of these modes.

Back! Video Through the years     VGA Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
Read this Media-Blog entry!» Nvidia+Socom Cranks that $#%^ UP!!!!! (4)
by mrinfinit3 (2) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 34 months ago


 Latest Headlines
South Park: The Stick of Truth VGA gameplay trailer (0)
New Hawken cinematic trailer heralds an open beta (0)
BioShock: Infinite VGA 2012 gameplay trailer (0)
New SimCity trailer highlights Multi-City gameplay (0)
Tomb Raider reboot gets new gameplay trailer (0)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


 Quick Fact
I'm missing a CD. I bet the Hamsters took it.


FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2013 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved