Introduction
So you’re stuck with integrated graphics. The lure of an affordable $399 desktop PC was just too much to pass up. Unfortunately however, you’re now finding that your PC’s integrated graphics aren’t quite capable of keeping up with your Left 4 Dead 2 or Team Fortress addiction, much less a more graphically advanced game like Crysis or Batman: Arkham Asylum. You now need a faster graphics card, but can’t afford to shell out the $100 for something newer like a Radeon 5700 series GPU, instead your budget is about $50-$60. What do you do?
ATI’s hoping you’ll opt for a Radeon 5450 graphics card. The 5450 is ATI’s newest graphics offering for the entry-level segment of the graphics market. Based on ATI’s “Cedar” graphics core, it’s fully DirectX 11 compliant and features 80 stream processors running at 650MHz. It isn’t exactly a blistering 3D performer (but nothing else is in this price bracket), as it’s designed to be a small, efficient chip that’s inexpensive to produce and priced to move.
If history’s any indication, PC builders will buy these chips by the truckload for use in value PCs, but the Radeon 5450 has one additional trick up its sleeve that should improve its appeal beyond just the budget shoppers that flock to these cards: Eyefinity. With support for up to three displays, the 5450 should appeal to businesses as well. After all, studies have shown that adding monitors improves employee productivity.
Never before has a $50 graphics card offered support for up to three monitors. This feature alone could potentially sell more Radeon 5450 cards for ATI than any other.
We say this in large part because this is arguably the most groundbreaking new feature found in the Radeon 5450. Sure, DX11 and HDMI 1.3a compliance is important, but with just 80 shaders the 5450 doesn’t have the horsepower to run a DX11 title with its eye candy effects turned up very far and still deliver playable performance. As you’ll see in the following chart, many key performance metrics are only up slightly over its predecessor, the Radeon 4350:
| Radeon 5450 Specifications |
| Radeon 4350 256MB DDR2 | Radeon 5450 512MB DDR3 |
| Stream Processors | 80 | 80 |
| Graphics Core Clock Speed | 600MHz | 650MHz |
| Texture Units | 8 | 8 |
| Texture Fill-rate | 4.8 Gigatexels/sec | 5.2 Gigatexels/sec |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| Pixel Fill-rate | 2.4 Gpixels/sec | 2.6 Gpixels/sec |
| Memory Clock Speed | 500MHz | Up to 800MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 8.0GB/sec | Up to 12.8GB/sec |
| Typical Board Power | 20W | 19.2W |
 |
Notes
As you can see, both the Radeon 4350 and 5450 feature an 80 stream processor architecture. The number of texture units and ROPs is also the same for both GPUs. ATI merely bumps up the graphics core clock in order to deliver improved fill rates.
Thanks to lower memory prices, ATI is able to integrate 512MB of faster 800MHz DDR3 memory. This has a significant impact on peak memory bandwidth – 12.8GB/sec versus 8GB/sec previously. It’s here where the Radeon 5450 delivers the most significant improvement over the 4350.
As you can see in the comparison chart though, we mentioned “up to 800MHz memory” and “up to 12.8GB/sec memory bandwidth”. This is because ATI is giving their board partners leeway on the 5450’s memory speeds and memory types. We’ve been told that board partners will be shipping 5450 boards with both DDR2 and DDR3 memory running at a range of memory speeds depending on the final price point the ATI board partner wants to target.
![ATI Radeon 5450 Performance Preview [ Juniper meets Cedar @ 1600 x 1200 ] > View Full-Size in another window.](images/04-s.jpg) Juniper meets Cedar
|
|
![ATI Radeon 5450 Performance Preview [ Radeon 5450 up top, compared to the 4350 @ 1600 x 1200 ] > View Full-Size in another window.](images/05-s.jpg) Radeon 5450 up top, compared to the 4350
|
|
ATI has told us that they’re urging their partners to be as clear as possible when it comes to listing memory type and speed, but it’s ultimately going to be in the hands of their board partners to police themselves. Bottom line: you’ll want to read the specs list closely before forking over your hard-earned cash on a new Radeon 5450 card.
Like ATI’s other Radeon 5000 series GPUs, Cedar is built on TSMC’s 40-nm manufacturing process. Transistor count weighs in at 292 million transistors, that’s 50 million more transistors than RV710. Thanks to the smaller process though, die size is down from 73 square millimeters in RV710 to just 59 sq.mm for Cedar.