FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Hardware : CPUs : Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 


Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
RAGE SIGGRAPH 2009 Screenshots [7] (0)

Bioshock: The Brutally Honest Review [Preliminary #2] (8) by Swatt
See Green (4) by mikearmour
FTW! (0) by Gh3tTo5oLdIeR
Overclocking: The Basics (2) by slugbug
Fury - The PvP Exclusive MMO? (3) by imoish
13.1 miles of EVGA (0) by Odoyle721
How to Overclock Guide (2) by SuperCharge
»» best haiku ever (0) by darkportal_4
DoW II 5-7-5, and the Limerick (1) by jarrodthome
BioShock Review(Preliminary #2) (3) by Hyper

More Blogs >>




Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566
April 13, 2000   Sarju Guido Shah > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | User Reviews | Article Images(5) | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
Overclocking

Installation

While installing this CPU, we were a bit hesitant due to the age of this board, and the limited support it offered officially. The most current bios update for my board (Abit BH6 ver 1.0) was the NV released on 11/26/99, well before the Celeron II ever came out. We theorized that maybe the voltage settings wouldn't work or maybe the motherboard wouldn't be able to support such a high multiplier. When the dust settled, we at FiringSquad thought it better to risk MY motherboard for the greater good.

Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566 [ Whoo weeee @ 410 x 426 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Whoo weeee

All this hooha was dispelled in a matter of seconds. When we first loaded the chip in the computer, it was recognized as an 806EB. Odd, but we were just happy it called the Celeron something. What followed was a little bios tweaking. We set the FSB to 100MHz and adjusted the voltage accordingly to 1.60 V. The BH6 multiplier only goes up to 8, but the motherboard was still able to autodetect the 566's 8.5 multiplier.

Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566 [ My Little 300a @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
My Little 300a

Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566 [ The Cel II with Heatsink @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
The Cel II with Heatsink

Off we went to load Windows, all went perfectly. At this point we were wondering what speed the CPU was running at since the motherboard had registered it as an 806EB. CPUId revealed the oh so great truth of 850 MHZ! We had a Celeron II working in an Abit BH6, running at 850 MHz. We ran a few tests benchmarks using Quake 3 and we had no troubles to speak of.

Turbo

Well we weren't quite satisfied. Sure one might think it's enough to have a CPU be compatible with a motherboard that is over two years old. But we here, want a little bit more. We were going to try and get a little bit more juice out of this baby. The Abit BH6 doesn't have too many FSB settings so we tried for 112 MHz. Either the RAM or the CPU failed, most likely the RAM since it is ancient. Undeterred, we sat down and realized that we could still squeeze a little more by enabling the turbo setting. Remember that little option? It upped our FSB to 103 MHz. It might not seem like much of a jump, but remember, we are dealing with a multiplier of 8.5, giving us an extra 25.5 MHz. CPUId registered a final speed of 877 MHz. Not too shabby, a 55% increase in speed over spec.

Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566 [ Odd Indeed @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Odd Indeed

Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566 [ Odd Cubed @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Odd Cubed

Latency

If you haven't read about these little Celermines, here is a little blurb: (to learn more read the Celeron 566 article. There are only three large factors that make this chip differ from a Coppermine. The new Celerons come with 128KB of L2 cache that has a latency setting of 2; the Coppermine is set at 0. The other two factors are of course the reduced cache size (Coppermine at 256KB L2) and the reduced bus speed. Since most Coppermines either come at a 133MHz, or can be overclocked to it, this will give them somewhat of an advantage. The Celeron II would have one hell of a time reaching a FSB of 133; this leaves only one more option, changing the latency setting of the cache. We attempted to change the latency setting of the cache but failed to do so. We didn't get to make this a neutered Coppermine, but the results weren't too shabby.

Back! Page 1     Test Bed Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
Read this Media-Blog entry!» War! Huh! Yeah! (aka Blatant Plagiarism) (1)
by ICDP (82) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 6 months ago


 Latest Headlines
Modern Warfare 2 PC limited to 9v9 matches (27)
RAGE won't support dedicated servers either (22)
NVIDIA earns $107.6 million in Q3 (2)
Battlefield Bad Company 2 beta plans announced (2)
Modern Warfare 2 launch trailer released (13)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


 Random Comment
Grape Soda isn't too bad.


FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2009 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved