FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Hardware : CPUs : Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 



Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
TERA February 2012 Screenshots [5] (0)

My Crank that S#!t up entry :) (15) by ZEZgames
CRANG That S#!T Up! (15) by ElwinRansom
My First Video (3) by Stryker
ENTRY FOR CONTEST (4) by Alexander470
Crank That PhysX UP! (10) by mohawkade
My First Entry For Crank That S#!T Up! (2) by deathknight.92
My crank that S#!t Up entry! (13) by zin_onos
Whoz's Cranking that S#!T (13) by whozthisguy
The Nvidia "Crank That S#!T Up" Quiz Show, Part 2 (6) by mohawkade
Blow That S#!t Up! (8) by Synchronous Failure

More Blogs >>




Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566
April 13, 2000   Sarju Guido Shah > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | User Reviews | Article Images(5) | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
Overclocking

Installation

While installing this CPU, we were a bit hesitant due to the age of this board, and the limited support it offered officially. The most current bios update for my board (Abit BH6 ver 1.0) was the NV released on 11/26/99, well before the Celeron II ever came out. We theorized that maybe the voltage settings wouldn't work or maybe the motherboard wouldn't be able to support such a high multiplier. When the dust settled, we at FiringSquad thought it better to risk MY motherboard for the greater good.

Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566 [ Whoo weeee @ 410 x 426 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Whoo weeee

All this hooha was dispelled in a matter of seconds. When we first loaded the chip in the computer, it was recognized as an 806EB. Odd, but we were just happy it called the Celeron something. What followed was a little bios tweaking. We set the FSB to 100MHz and adjusted the voltage accordingly to 1.60 V. The BH6 multiplier only goes up to 8, but the motherboard was still able to autodetect the 566's 8.5 multiplier.

Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566 [ My Little 300a @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
My Little 300a

Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566 [ The Cel II with Heatsink @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
The Cel II with Heatsink

Off we went to load Windows, all went perfectly. At this point we were wondering what speed the CPU was running at since the motherboard had registered it as an 806EB. CPUId revealed the oh so great truth of 850 MHZ! We had a Celeron II working in an Abit BH6, running at 850 MHz. We ran a few tests benchmarks using Quake 3 and we had no troubles to speak of.

Turbo

Well we weren't quite satisfied. Sure one might think it's enough to have a CPU be compatible with a motherboard that is over two years old. But we here, want a little bit more. We were going to try and get a little bit more juice out of this baby. The Abit BH6 doesn't have too many FSB settings so we tried for 112 MHz. Either the RAM or the CPU failed, most likely the RAM since it is ancient. Undeterred, we sat down and realized that we could still squeeze a little more by enabling the turbo setting. Remember that little option? It upped our FSB to 103 MHz. It might not seem like much of a jump, but remember, we are dealing with a multiplier of 8.5, giving us an extra 25.5 MHz. CPUId registered a final speed of 877 MHz. Not too shabby, a 55% increase in speed over spec.

Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566 [ Odd Indeed @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Odd Indeed

Abit BH6 and Celeron II 566 [ Odd Cubed @ 800 x 600 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Odd Cubed

Latency

If you haven't read about these little Celermines, here is a little blurb: (to learn more read the Celeron 566 article. There are only three large factors that make this chip differ from a Coppermine. The new Celerons come with 128KB of L2 cache that has a latency setting of 2; the Coppermine is set at 0. The other two factors are of course the reduced cache size (Coppermine at 256KB L2) and the reduced bus speed. Since most Coppermines either come at a 133MHz, or can be overclocked to it, this will give them somewhat of an advantage. The Celeron II would have one hell of a time reaching a FSB of 133; this leaves only one more option, changing the latency setting of the cache. We attempted to change the latency setting of the cache but failed to do so. We didn't get to make this a neutered Coppermine, but the results weren't too shabby.

Back! Page 1     Test Bed Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
Read this Media-Blog entry!» My First Entry For Crank That S#!T Up! (2)
by deathknight.92 () Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 19 months ago


 Hottest Topics
Blizzard appealing to block Valve trademarking DOTA (10)
Skyrim mod toolkit and Steam Workshop integration arrive with free official high-resolution texture pack (6)
Obsidian has 'Kickstarter fever', asks for suggestions (6)
Diablo 3 dev diary explains nightmare mode difficulty (5)
Bethesda shows modders how it's done: see what Skyrim developers added during free-form 'Game Jam' week (5)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


 Random Comment
Grape Soda isn't too bad.


FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2012 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved