FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Hardware : Cool Stuff : Budget LCD Roundup April 2005
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 


Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
STALKER: Call of Pripyat DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11 Screenshots [10] (3)

Overclocking: The Basics (2) by slugbug
Know Your Roots: Unreal Tournament Review [Preliminary #2] (10) by Discobiscuits
A Truely "Epic" Game: Unreal Tournament 3 Review (4) by Discobiscuits
Apple of your eye... (0) by SuperCharge
See Green (4) by mikearmour
SHOCK & Awwwwww (1) by PS2Fish
Meditation of a Tyranid (0) by Aftermath
FTW! (0) by Gh3tTo5oLdIeR
So what if it doesn't follow the topic? (0) by ICDP
The Orange Box Review in 500 Words! [Preliminary #2] (7) by Swatt

More Blogs >>




Budget LCD Roundup April 2005
April 07, 2005   Alexis Dang > [View My Other Articles]
Alan Dang > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | User Reviews | Article Images(40) | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
The Importance of Color Accuracy



Contrast Ratio: It’s Not Everything

When it comes to picture quality, brightness and contrast ratio are often talked about. However, we want you to realize that the most important element is neither contrast ratio nor brightness, but color accuracy. It’s true that we want contrasty images that aren’t washed out, but when we use the term “contrasty,” we’re actually talking more about micro-contrast and color accuracy than actual contrast. To prove this to you, let’s see why contrast ratio alone isn’t a useful measurement.

“Contrast ratio” is measured by comparing the intensity of the brightest white and the darkest black. Let’s take a look at two images

Budget LCD Roundup April 2005 [ Is this photo sharper than... @ 800 x 533 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Is this photo sharper than...

Budget LCD Roundup April 2005 [ ...this one? @ 800 x 533 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
...this one?


The top has a higher contrast ratio and obviously looks better. What’s important to notice is that your brain isn’t simply thinking of the second image as having less contrast, but is seeing it as being blurrier and less sharp. There’s actually no difference in resolving power, but that’s not how our brain interprets things. That’s why looking at test patterns alone won’t be effective.

That first set of images shouldn’t surprise anyone too much, but let’s take a look at another set of images:

Budget LCD Roundup April 2005 [ Guess which has the higher contrast ratio? @ 600 x 400 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
Guess which has the higher contrast ratio?

Budget LCD Roundup April 2005 [ It is this one @ 600 x 400 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
It is this one


Which one looks more contrasty and less washed out? The second image is “less contrasty” and more washed out, but surprisingly, the contrast ratio in the washed out images is higher. There is a greater difference between the darkest black and brightest white in the washed out images than the nicer looking images. The problem is that contrast ratio only talks about the extremes of brightness and doesn’t say anything about the colors “in-between black and white.” That’s why looking at contrast ratio alone is misleading.

That’s not the only problem with contrast. Let’s look at these two images:

Budget LCD Roundup April 2005 [ This could use a little extra contrast... @ 1275 x 850 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
This could use a little extra contrast...

Budget LCD Roundup April 2005 [ ...but this is too much @ 1275 x 850 ] > View Full-Size in another window.
...but this is too much


Clearly the first picture looks better, but in this case, it’s not about the second image being “washed out.” The second image has a higher contrast because the difference in intensity between the clouds and the sky is greater. Still, it looks worse.

What’s really important is a concept related to local contrast and “microcontrast” which describes the local transition between the light and dark. It’s not that you want a big “overall” difference between dark and light portions of the image. You want the transitions between light and dark to be rapid and visible. In order for the clouds to look perfect, you want to see all of the texture rather than have all the colors be the same. You want to be able to see the fine differences in color. Micro-contrast is what gives images that 3-dimensional, looking-through-a-glass-window effect. You want to see the difference between the light blue and the slightly lighter blue.



Back! The Legend of DVI     Colorimetry Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
I am an AMD AgentRead this Media-Blog entry!» What is so cool about Gigabyte’s Ultra-Durable 3 technology (0)
by SuperCharge (4) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 6 months ago


 Hottest Topics
New Modern Warfare 2 PC petition created (33)
ATI Radeon 5970 Performance Preview (12)
BioShock 2 special edition includes vinyl LP (12)
Activision hopes to monetize some aspects of CoD multi (11)
Modern Warfare 2 PC outsells Call of Duty 4 (11)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


 Random Fact
If this is too much detail, don’t worry.

FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2009 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved