Heretic II and MCM
Heretic II Performance - fstest.hd2
|
Voodoo2 Single @ 800x600
|
|
Celeron 550Mhz Socket-370
|
49.2 fps
|
|
Celeron 366Mhz Socket-370
|
36.1 fps
|
|
Celeron 333Mhz Slot-1
|
32.0 fps
|
|
Pentium II 500Mhz Slot-1
|
46.1 fps
|
|
Pentium II 400Mhz Slot-1
|
37.7 fps
|
RivaTNT @ 800x600
|
|
Celeron 550Mhz Socket-370
|
34.3 fps
|
|
Celeron 366Mhz Socket-370
|
30.1 fps
|
|
Celeron 333Mhz Slot-1
|
28.1 fps
|
|
Pentium II 500Mhz Slot-1
|
33.5 fps
|
|
Pentium II 400Mhz Slot-1
|
30.9 fps
|
Heretic II, based on the Quake II engine with OpenGL drivers, shows much of the same. Voodoo performance taking a slight lead over TNT, but with the TNT providing more consistent framerates through the demo. This test was run with a single Voodoo2 as opposed to SLI for the Quake II tests.
Motocross Madness - Direct3D Performance
|
Voodoo2 Single @ 800x600
|
|
Celeron 550Mhz Socket-370
|
48.2 fps avg
|
|
Celeron 366Mhz Socket-370
|
37.4 fps avg
|
|
Celeron 333Mhz Slot-1
|
35.4 fps avg
|
|
Pentium II 500Mhz Slot-1
|
45.9 fps avg
|
|
Pentium II 400Mhz Slot-1
|
42.1 fps avg
|
RivaTNT @ 800x600
|
|
Celeron 550Mhz Socket-370
|
54.2 fps avg
|
|
Celeron 366Mhz Socket-370
|
43.6 fps avg
|
|
Celeron 333Mhz Slot-1
|
41.5 fps avg
|
|
Pentium II 500Mhz Slot-1
|
53.4 fps avg
|
|
Pentium II 400Mhz Slot-1
|
51.2 fps avg
|
Since there is no demo recording function for Motocross Madness, these tests are a bit more subjective, taking framerate screenshots at 30-second intervals from a standstill for the length of a 5-lap race against 8 opponents on the Houston Supercross course.


Lots of Screenshots
Here we see an interesting turn of events. For the first time in these tests, the TNT takes a leap forward in performance, beating out the single Voodoo2 on all configurations at 800x600. This is a testament to the exceptional Direct3D performance of the RivaTNT chipset.