FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Hardware : Video Cards : 3D Performance with Fallout 3: Part 1 High-end Cards
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 



Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
Reset Game Announcement Screenshots [4] (0)

Crank It Up! (11) by Kilos
My Entry For The Contest. (6) by D4rk Force
Crank That S#!t Up!!!! (6) by CamoDaGreat
[FX] 3-Screen Effect - Guide (part-2) (0) by nGAGE
[FX] 3-Screen Effect - Guide (part-1) (0) by nGAGE
Crank that s#!t up to 11!!! (14) by jarrodthome
[FX] 3-Screen Effect - Guide (part-4) (0) by nGAGE
Crank THIS sH!t up! - 3DforREAL (71) by nGAGE
CRANG That S#!T Up! (15) by ElwinRansom
My crank that S#!T up entry (9) by iamcj

More Blogs >>




3D Performance with Fallout 3: Part 1 High-end Cards
November 06, 2008   Brandon Sandman Bell > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | User Reviews | Article Images(18) | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
Fallout 3 8xAA








Fallout 3 Performance 1920x1200
CardMin FPSMax FPS
GeForce GTX 2803565
GeForce GTX 2602957
GeForce GTX 260 Core 2163158
GeForce 9800 GTX+2240
GeForce 9800 GTX1934
GeForce 880 Ultra2744
GeForce 8800 GTX2440
Radeon HD 4870 X24485
Radeon HD 4870 1GB3160
Radeon HD 4870 512MB2543
Radeon HD 4850 512MB1838


Notes

The Radeon 4870 X2 continues to be CPU-bound under 8xAA. Again, this is very impressive considering the graphics settings we’re running as well as the Intel CPU we’re using for testing. The GeForce GTX 280 also delivers very playable frame rates under 8xAA at 1600x1200 and 1920x1200, although by 2560x1600 performance begins to become too choppy.

ATI’s Radeon 4870 1GB puts up a stronger showing under 8xAA. It now runs faster than both GeForce GTX 260 GPUs, and nearly performs evenly with the GTX 280 at 2560x1600. The GTX 260 Core 216 then runs 3-11% slower than the 4870 1GB. The GTX 260 continues to run around 3% slower than the 216-core GTX 260 GPU.

Interestingly enough, we see a pretty significant performance gap between the Radeon 4870 512MB and the 1GB board. At just 1600x1200 with 8xAA the margin is a surprising 9% and it grows from there. At 1920x1200 the gap grows to 24%. The Radeon 4850 also puts up a stronger showing under 8xAA, outrunning the 9800 GTX in our testing. Despite their age, the GeForce 8800 cards also continue to perform well.



Back! 4xAA benchmarks     Final thoughts Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
I am an AMD AgentRead this Media-Blog entry!» Drink That S#!t Up! (14)
by p4l1ndr0m3 (499) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 18 months ago


 Hottest Topics
Blizzard appealing to block Valve trademarking DOTA (11)
Obsidian has 'Kickstarter fever', asks for suggestions (6)
Assassin's Creed 3 announced, coming in October (6)
Bethesda shows modders how it's done: see what Skyrim developers added during free-form 'Game Jam' week (5)
Diablo 3 dev diary explains nightmare mode difficulty (5)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2012 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved