FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Hardware : Video Cards : 3Dlabs Oxygen GVX1 Review
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 


Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
RAGE SIGGRAPH 2009 Screenshots [7] (0)

The Bland Addiction: World of Warcraft (17) by Discobiscuits
Rodent Device (2) by PS2Fish
Athlon Overclocking (For Reference) (1) by email_atif
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare SP Review (prelim 2) (9) by jacobvandy
DoW II 5-7-5, and the Limerick (1) by jarrodthome
WW2 License Plate says it all (0) by Ph33rsPhun
Apple of your eye... (0) by SuperCharge
EVGA: my number 1 (0) by imagination
Meditation of a Tyranid (0) by Aftermath
13.1 miles of EVGA (0) by Odoyle721

More Blogs >>




3Dlabs Oxygen GVX1 Review
July 11, 1999   Tim Hsu > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | User Reviews | Article Images(2) | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
Lightwave 3D 5.6

These tests in Lightwave show the time that it takes to OpenGL render a 3D object that moves through 3D space, strictly through th card. The 3D object in each case is given by the name of the benchmark. The mech demo shows a walking mech, the ape demo shows a running ape, and Kenn's demo shows.....an F-18 fighter jet. Ok, so it's not Kenn. In each case, the object moves through 3D space in an empty, wireframe background. The object is made up of a number of polygons, and in some cases directional lighting is cast on the object. Thus, the lower the number the better, because the numbers show how many seconds it takes to complete the animated sequence. As you can see, the Oxygen GVX1 is noticeable faster than the TNT2 Ultra that we used, clocked at normal nVidia TNT2 Ultra 150/183MHz speeds. In each test, we see that the Oxygen GVX1 is some 30% faster than the TNT2.

First off, the onboard geometry processor known as the GLINT Gamma G1 is faster than the PIII 500. This is not due to overall speed of the processor and how many computations it can make, but because it is located onboard so the transfer of data is much faster. 3Dlabs claims that the onboard GLINT Gamma G1 is up to four times as a Pentium III 500 in some cases. Virtual textures are something that would help in more advanced sequences, where we would actually have more textures onscreen at once, but these benchmarks did not involve the use of many textures.

Back! The test system     Ballistics Report Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
Read this Media-Blog entry!» Never fallen (0)
by froggz (643) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 6 months ago


 Hottest Topics
New Modern Warfare 2 PC petition created (33)
ATI Radeon 5970 Performance Preview (12)
BioShock 2 special edition includes vinyl LP (12)
Activision hopes to monetize some aspects of CoD multi (11)
Modern Warfare 2 PC outsells Call of Duty 4 (11)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


 Quick Facts
The "custom demo" that we used was put together by Sam, aka GX-Assassin.

FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2009 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved