FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Hardware : CPUs : Quake 4 Dual-Core Performance: AMD & Intel
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 


Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
Silent Hunter: Wolves of the Pacific Review Screenshots [74] (4)


Guild Wars Gets a Bad Review (9) by Joluha
S.T.A.L.K.E.R Screenshot - An Artistic Touch (1) by sushrukh
Don't Shoot! (0) by L10nhardt
Guitar Hero 3 - The thing that should not be (UPDATED) (5) by Beefysworld
A Truely "Epic" Game: Unreal Tournament 3 Review (4) by Discobiscuits
UT3 anyone ;0 (2) by DEsanitE
Entering Hell (0) by Fisherman
Tiberium Anyone? (0) by jetstar503
Civilization IV Review for contest (9) by Joluha
Do the Robot! (0) by culeXor

More Blogs >>




Quake 4 Dual-Core Performance: AMD & Intel
December 23, 2005   Chris Crazipper Angelini > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | User Reviews | Article Images | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
System Setup


System Setup


Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 840 3.2 GHz
Intel Pentium D 840 3.2 GHz
Intel Pentium 4 540 3.2 GHz

AMD Athlon 64 3800+ 2.4 GHz
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 2.0 GHz
AMD Athlon 64 4800+ 2.4 GHz

Intel D975XBX Motherboard
ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe Motherboard

ATI Radeon X1800 XT with Catalyst 5.13

34GB Western Digital Raptor (10,000RPM, 8MB cache)

Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 2

DirectX 9.0c

Desktop resolution 1024x768, 32-bit color, 85Hz refresh

Notes

Let’s talk about our configuration choices here for a second. On the Intel side, I chose three similarly clocked Pentium processors. Comparisons between the two 840s help determine just how many threads Quake 4 is capable of recognizing. Comparing the 840 and 540 reveals the impact of a second physical core of similar design (I could have used the 640 instead, but then we’d get into issues over 1MB of L2 cache versus 2MB and so on).

For the AMD platform, we have a pair of 3800+ processors, which should shed some light on the value of similarly rated models, one with one core and one with two. Because they aren’t running at the same speed, though, it’s hard to really flesh out the benefits of threading. Thus, the single-core 3800+ is being compared to the dual-core 4800+, both at 2.4 GHz.

You’ll also notice that we’re running an ATI Radeon X1800 XT. In light of previously confirmed issues with NVIDIA’s latest drivers and this threading-aware patch, we’ll reserve judgment on GeForce 7-series cards for another day.


Back! Page 1     Intel Processor Results Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
I am an AMD AgentRead this Media-Blog entry!» Round 2 Rules! (20)
by FS-Lyle (167) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 9 months ago

Sponsored Links
:
[GO]


 Hottest Topics
Should Nintendo rush a new Wii to market? (46)
Gears of Wars 2 not coming to PC (38)
It's official: Comcast to cap users bandwidth (34)
Microsoft Hardware unit: 'Say Goodbye To Laser' (29)
Its official: Xbox 360 gets huge price cuts (25)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


Mortgages  Fitnessgeräte  Loans  Find a Doctor in Washington  Homeowner Loans
FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2008 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved