FiringSquad: Home of the Hardcore Gamer - Games, Hardware, Reviews and NewsSubmit your own or view users' CPU overclocking results!

  
 Home   News   THE MATRIX   Deals   Hardware   Games   Features   Media   Products   Forums   FS China 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Home : Guides : Choosing Components : Eternal Battle Day 4: Ultimate Gaming PC versus Ultimate Workstation Benchmarks
» Join the Greatest Gaming Community NOW! (It's free)

Already a member? Login
 


Random Gallery >> 
Click to view high-res Image!
The Burning Crusade: Preview 2 Screenshots [43] (4)

Banana (4) by p4l1ndr0m3
Know Your Roots: Unreal Tournament Review [Preliminary #2] (10) by Discobiscuits
Guitar Hero 3 - The thing that should not be (UPDATED) (5) by Beefysworld
Round 2 Rules! (20) by fs-lyle
Meditation of a Tyranid (0) by Aftermath
A Truely "Epic" Game: Unreal Tournament 3 Review (4) by Discobiscuits
C&C:Renegade Review, wrist-slittingly good! (8) by McStu
»» best haiku ever (0) by darkportal_4
How to Overclock Guide (2) by SuperCharge
PC in a world of Crysis (3) by greennova

More Blogs >>




Eternal Battle Day 4: Ultimate Gaming PC versus Ultimate Workstation Benchmarks
June 29, 2005   Alan Dang > [View My Other Articles]
Product Info | User Reviews | Article Images | Image Gallery | Comments | Forum Thread
Photography Benchmarks










With Capture One, the dual Opteron 252 proves to be the fastest system available but the Athlon 64 X2 is still a superstar. High-bandwidth/high latency RAM and low-latency /standard bandwidth RAM appeared to perform similarly.



With Bibble, the more cores you can throw at the application, the faster it gets. Again the benefit from low-latency RAM is split. The dual core Athlon64 X2 is again shows impressive results.



Like Bibble, Noise Ninja is capable of taking advantage of 4 CPU cores and so the dual Opteron 275’s are at the top of the pack.






Photoshop’s RAW processing engine does not appear to take advantage of multiple CPUs as well as Bibble does. Nevetheless, it is interesting to see that the Athlon64 X2 4200+ is notably faster than the dual Opteron 252, despite the Opteron having a faster core clock speed and significantly higher bandwidth. Although we clearly need to run more tests, it may be that the single core Athlons are CPU-bound tests whereas the Athlon64 X2 4200+ represents a memory bound test in which low-latency is valued.



Back! CPU Benchmarks     Digital Video Benchmarks Next!
Blog + Share: Digg Del.icio.us Reddit SU furl • More: AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Send This Article to a Friend!  
Table of Contents
  Print Entire Article  

MATRIX CONTENT » RANDOM MEDIA BLOG More Blogs >>
No ratings yet
» Please rate this
I am an AMD AgentRead this Media-Blog entry!» Overclocking: The Basics (2)
by slugbug (231) Talk with this user on their Shout Box (My other blogs) Posted 5 months ago


 Latest Headlines
AMD Life After DX11 Contest (4)
Analyst says game review scores least important factor for gamers (0)
Next Star Wars game teased (0)
Mass Effect 2 system requirements announced (0)
Get ready for Far Cry 3 (0)
Today's News >>
Today's Siteseeing >>


 Table of Contents


FiringSquad is powered by... Back to Top Site MapContact UsAdvertise With Us Privacy StatementAbout Us  
News RSSSiteseeing RSSArticle RSS   © 1998-2009 FS Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved