




 |
 |




| News Link » /news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=12851 | LazyGarfield (256) Nov 20, 2006 - 04:40 am
| I´m educated enough to know that you´d see tearing if you dont force your driver to render not more than 60 fps ;-) So 100 fps does nothing with TFT´s no matter what GPU ya using since the tearing would make your eyes water :P With that "feature" the game doesnt even need to support motion blur :D
8 ms G2G can raise up to to 25+ ms whilst displaying colour and I would not consider that fast, even though YOU are not seeing any ghosting.
How the GF8800 will perform with Crysis we will see soon enough... I will go for it when I´ll be needing it and not be4. That probably saves some 100 usd since there´s a huge difference between having money and wasting it ,-) Flag this | Edit this post |




| Siteseeing Link » /news/siteseeingarticle.asp?searchid=3617 | LazyGarfield (256) Nov 14, 2006 - 05:38 am
| Your "history" is just the lies your goverment have fed you with since the year 1900 ;-)
Did you know that Castro asked your president in the 50th to help them democratize and he rejected it several times? Guess why... because rich US-ppl owned 90 % of that place and wanted to have cheap workers ;-)
Thats american history... nothing but fight but not for freedom.... just for the upper class´ money.
And if you dont know that facts it just states, your knowledge of history is to belive in what your politicians fed you with :D
Burn Bush! Flag this | Edit this post |

| News Link » /news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=12851 | LazyGarfield (256) Nov 14, 2006 - 05:30 am » Edited on Nov 14, 2006 - 05:39 am
| 37" is just a TV ;-)
Can be used for gaming but that big screen makes you tired fast while playing.
Once I used a beamer to play Diablo2 on my wall... after 2 hours I went back to my 19" display since the way your eyes have to move is too far. Ok... that was way bigger than 37" :) Actually the "screen" was almost from the floor to the roof of my flat, hight aprox 2,3 meter :P Flag this | Edit this post |

| News Link » /news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=12851 | LazyGarfield (256) Nov 14, 2006 - 05:13 am
| ya right, it´s not really a monitor!
It supports too less resolutions. There´s nothing between 1024 x 768 and 1920 x 1200. So you can play either actual games with a slide show @1920 if your GPU is outdated (which it is fast enough nowadays) or @1024 which I presume is worsly interpolated with ugly artifacts.
Still I´m looking for a 40+" TV who is fast enough for gaming as well. The mentioned 8 ms (G2G) is the worst lie ever with 40+"-TFT´s.
At least I know now what specs I have to draw my attention to :D Flag this | Edit this post |



| News Link » /news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=12851 | LazyGarfield (256) Nov 14, 2006 - 04:24 am
| For me the 2048 resolution will be interesting by the year 2008 or maybe even later, when the panel prices drop down near the 1000 Euro mark and when a single GPU can handle FPS-Games @ this resolution on high settings.
Actually I´m refusing to buy two video cards but maybe one GFX-card with 2 GPU´s might be an option later.
Actually I went for 1920 x 1200 for having a panel who is supporting the HDTV-1080p-resolution. Flag this | Edit this post |




 |
|
|
|