

 Tiger Woods Out...Until August!
 |


| | (Post a comment) » Removed: FSAA Comparison: V5500/ GF2If you're looking for our first FSAA comparison article, we've decided to yank it from the site. After a good deal of internal discussion today, we decided on this course of action because the protocols used in the first article were not the best possible way to base a comparison. As mentioned before, we're working on a new comparison test involving two identically configured machines, sitting side by side.
FSAA is a very complex topic, and it's certainly a feature that cannot be characterized, measured, or compared by any traditional means. Because of that, we're going to handle the new article with even more care and attention than anything we've ever done before. FiringSquad is committed to providing the highest quality content. We're not going to be satisfied with anything less than our best possible effort. | Previous news article | Back to main news | Next news article  |

| You are viewing the comments as Guest and are limited to 10 messages per page. [Login] Not an FS Member? Register here, it's FREE! You will see more posts per page and you can filter out the Anonymous comments as well as enable the profanity filter. |
|
#52
|
Author:
|
_Silver_ at 04:22pm 07/11/2002
|
|
Response to #51:
Reply to This
|
Ohw yeah, I've read some stuff, thought about it and THEN posted,
don't worry
ROFL
|
| |
 |
|
#51
|
Author:
|
_Silver_ at 04:22pm 07/11/2002
|
|
Comment:
Reply to This
|
Some things for all you guys to consider (I know, they are mostly in
favor for 3dfx, but it's just that noone here ever considered these
obvious points):
1. The clockspeed of the vsa-100 chips aren't final, they are still
considering 183mhz! And if they do, the memory will also be run at
183mhz... That should give a very nice performance boost. I know it
is wishfull thinking, but who knows...
2. The FSAA of voodoo series is technically better than that of GF2
(in my understanding). You see, they both clear up the jaggies, BUT
I believe 3dfx's implementation is the only of the two that gets rid
of texture trashing, pixel popping, texture swimming or whatever you
may call it. It doesn't show that well in Q3... That's also one of
the main reasons I would prefer 3dfx's FSAA, coz you can always get
less jaggies by increasing resolution.
3. I still consider the FSAA of the geforce software. Why? It is
done by the drivers, they say to the card (in a very simplistic
way): 'Hey, here's the data for a 3D screen, when you're done, scale
it down.'. While 3dfx's solution is like a switch on the card
itself: on or off. On will anti-alias EVERY 3d output of the card,
whatever API is used. While the Geforce drivers have to be written
for that specific API. That's why they won't work in d3d yet. And
that's why I consider it software. It's a feature they introduced
with DRIVERS=SOFTWARE. There are no alterations at all made to the
architecture, only the fillrate is there to support FSAA. Nah, I
said it. BUT who cares if it is software of harware, as long as it
works.
4. The voodoo will still see a lot of improvements with the driver,
you can clearly se
Read the rest of this comment...
|
| |
 |
|
#50
|
Author:
|
Anonymous at 02:15am 05/3/2000
|
|
Comment:
Reply to This
|
You know, I'm just gonna say 'screw it' and sit things out for a
while.
The Voodoo5 offers nothing really significant for me over my current
GeForce/Voodoo3 setup, and neither does the GeForce 2 GTS.
Until a game doesn't run gorgeously (and that's not gonna happen
soon on MY system) I'm not touching ANY new video cards.
Screw 3dfx and nvidia zealots, I'm giving my money to both and
spending the rest on pornography
|
| |
 |
|
#49
|
Author:
|
Anonymous at 10:57pm 05/2/2000
|
|
Comment:
Reply to This
|
I just wanna see some real driver fixes from 3dfx.
Are these drivers limited to enabled v-sync?
I mean, SLI should double performance, right? And the FSAA is done
by using one chip for one 'altered' angle, the other for the other,
right?
That makes it seem like, without 2x FSAA, the Voodoo5 should be
twice the speed, yet isn't.
I can only see this being a v-sync thing (unless 3dfx really $$#@&@
up on drivers), any ideas firingsquad?
Either way, I think the V5-5500 might be a bit late. the 5000 might
not be, since 16 megs of ram is enough for 800x600 with goodies
,right?
So if that's the same speed (lets presume it is) as a 5500 at
800x600, that should look as good (or better) as a 1600x1200
resolution on other cards.
Just an idea, mind you.
|
| |
 |
|
#48
|
Author:
|
chewie371 at 04:22pm 07/11/2002
|
|
Response to #43:
Reply to This
|
"One card is still pre-release with nearly perfected drivers,
the other is out, but with very immature drivers. "
Dude, no offense, but since when were pre-release drivers ever more
mature than release drivers, thats like saying the Voodoo5 drivers
will never get better. GF2 is using the same drivers as GF so those
drivers would be a lot more refined than Voodoo5 drivers. Usually I
just read these forums and dont post much, but that one statement
bothered me. Pre-Release drivers will never be nearly perfected and
release drivers should logically be better
|
| |
|
#46
|
Author:
|
Anonymous at 08:17pm 05/2/2000
|
|
Response to #39:
Reply to This
|
"I'm fully aware of that.
Reread my post captain anonymous."
I did read your post. Twice. You're being an idiot and you are
wrong. The points you made are either incorrect or misleading. You
pointed out an irrelevant technicality while you ignored the
original post.
And my name is Brian.
|
| |
|
#45
|
Author:
|
Anonymous at 08:14pm 05/2/2000
|
|
Response to #38:
Reply to This
|
"A torontonian? (yes, dammit, I didn't capitalize on purpose!
:)
The Leafs are going down."
I'm a transplanted torontonian - I'm originally from Nova Scotia.
And, no, no I am not a fisherman. =)
And the Habs are my team - I hope the Leafs lose, too, and for the
same reasons...
Brian
Tronna
|
| |
|
#44
|
Author:
|
Ender_Wiggen at 04:22pm 07/11/2002
|
|
Comment:
Reply to This
|
Ok, this is kinda off subject, but I tried playing Homeworld with
FSAA enabled on my ASUS V6600 Pure (GeForce SDR) and it looks
awesome.
I'm running it at 1024x768x32bpp with FSAA on my K6-2 400 (yes I'm
going to get a new system very soon) and it only drops below 30-40
fps when there are major amounts of ships on screen. I don't know
about you, but I think this is pretty impressive. I can't imagine
how fast it would be with GeForce2's hardware FSAA. (I think
GeForce2 has hardware FSAA)
|
| |
 |
|
#43
|
Author:
|
Anonymous at 06:11pm 05/2/2000
|
|
Response to #2:
Reply to This
|
Wake up for about 2 seconds dude. If FS was such an Nvidia whore
then they wouldn't even run reviews of 3dfx products. And how is
this test biased? One card is still pre-release with nearly
perfected drivers, the other is out, but with very immature drivers.
And the reason that they don't test on a GHz CPU is that they are
extremely hard to come by, and most people can't afford them. I
worked my a** off to get enough money to get my 733MHz system, and
even then had to wait for the price to drop. By testing on 600MHz
CPU's for the most part, and 500-550MHz Celerons other times, FS is
showing more real world performance. They want to show what most
average people can expect, not just what some little rich kid with a
new 1GHz system with everything on it would see.
In other words, stop griping about the fact that 3dfx screwed the
pooch on this one. I mean &@!!, it takes 2 VSA-100 processors to
edge out a single GeForce2 chip? Maybe when games get outrageously
detailed and actually NEED the extra processing power we can see a
difference, but by then everyone will have new and better cards. I,
for one, prefer quality over framerate anyways. I managed to do
quite well on my old 75MHz computer with 16mb of ram in the original
Team Fortress for Quake. Even with a framerate of 14 in 320x200
software mode and a 28.8 connection I was able to humble quite a few
people. Framerate does not equal skill, nor does bandwidth. So 25fps
in Quake3 at 1600x1200x32 is just peachy with me.
For the record, I am not biased towards Nvidia OR 3dfx. I buy
whatever card I think is best for me. When I started looking for a
new computer (back in the mid/late p2 era) I was
Read the rest of this comment...
|
| |
 |
|
#41
|
Author:
|
Sephiroth at 04:22pm 07/11/2002
|
|
Response to #40:
Reply to This
|
FSAA has been the most prominent part of 3dfx's publicity mantra for
the Voodoo 5 since the beginning, so yes, it would be truly damning
if it failed to work on applications that used the mainstream
graphics API of Windows. NVIDIA's FSAA quietly showed up in a leaked
driver set just recently, so it should be quite forgivable that the
current release of the drivers has issues with D3D FSAA.
|
| |
 Gigabyte P55 Lynnfield-ready Motherboard Roundup
 If you're in the market for a new P55 motherboard to go along with your new Lynnfield CPU you'll definitely want to check out today's article. Inside ... [+] (Comments) | Left 4 Dead 2 PC Review
 Valve says Left 4 Dead 2 contains so much new content, it's worthy of a sequel rather than DLC. Is this true or false? Judge for yourself in today's r... [+] (Comments) |
ATI Radeon 5970 Performance Preview
 After a 10-month hiatus, ATI's once again got the world's fastest graphics card. The Radeon 5970 fuses two RV870 chips onto one board for max performa... [+] (Comments) | Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 PC Review
 With no dedicated servers, no lean, and 18-player cap for multi, does Modern Warfare 2 for PC live up to its predecessors? Most of the reviews online ... [+] (Comments) |
Sapphire Radeon 5870 Vapor-X 1GB Review
 With its custom vapor chamber cooling+heatpipes and factory OC'ing, Sapphire's 5870 Vapor-X is targeted towards gamers looking for a 5870 card with a ... [+] (Comments) | Dragon Age Origins Review
 |
Phenom II Gets A New Revision: 125W AMD Phenom II X4 965 Performance Preview
 Promising lower power consumption, lower temps, and most importantly for enthusiasts, more OC'ing, AMD is back with a new CPU revision for the Phenom ... [+] (Comments) | Shattered Horizon Review
 FutureMark, well known for their popular 3DMark benchmarks, is venturing into new territory with Shattered Horizon. This multiplayer shooter is perhap... [+] (Comments) |
| AMD Athlon II X3 435/Athlon II X2 240e Performance Preview
 Today AMD is introducing 8 new Athlon II CPUs intended to service different segments of the budget CPU market. For HTPC users, new 45W dual, triple, a... [+] (Comments) | Borderlands PC Review
 Is it an RPG or is it an FPS? Borderlands blends the best elements of both in one entertaining package. Vandy has spent the past week playing the PC v... [+] (Comments) |
EVGA P55 FTW Review
 Looking for a good P55 motherboard to OC your CPU beyond 4GHz? If so, you may want to check out EVGA's P55 FTW. With its extra ATX12V connector, this ... [+] (Comments) | Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising Review
 While it's not the true sequel to Operation Flashpoint, Dragon Rising is billed as a modern tactical sim just like its predecessor. Does it live up to... [+] (Comments) |
ATI Radeon HD 5770/5750 Performance Preview
 With prices ranging from $109-$159, ATI's Radeon 5700 series of cards bring DX11 gaming to mainstream price points and usher in new levels of energy e... [+] (Comments) | Batman: Arkham Asylum PC Review
 Already a smash hit on consoles, the PC version of Batman: Arkham Asylum sports better graphics and support for NVIDIA technologies PhysX and 3D Visio... [+] (Comments) |
Batman: Arkham Asylum PhysX Features and Performance
 One eye candy feature PC users can enjoy over the console edition of Batman: AA is PhysX. Rocksteady's PhysX implementation is more than just tearing ... [+] (Comments) | Resident Evil 5 PC Review
 Sporting a new mercenaries mode with more enemies on screen, higher resolution DX10 graphics, and 3D Vision support, Resident Evil 5 is definitely bes... [+] (Comments) |
| More Hardware » | More Games » | Interviews » |

| | 




This Month
 October 1 - 31, 2009
 September 1 - 30, 2009
 August 1 - 31, 2009
 July 1 - 31, 2009
 June 1 - 30, 2009
 May 1 - 31, 2009
 April 1 - 30, 2009
 March 1 - 31, 2009
 February 1 - 28, 2009
 January 1 - 31, 2009
 December 1 - 31, 2008
 November 1 - 30, 2008

| 
 |
|