» Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

Labotomizer (989)    Sep 18, 2009 - 02:33 pm

I'm guessing in large part because every house damn near has a PC and we now have $100 cards that can match and beat the performance of the 360 or PS3. Since you already have the PC it's more cost effective to spend the $100 and get a graphics card, plus you save money on the majority of games that come out. Sometimes you have to wait a little longer, sometimes you get it earlier. About equal footing with consoles there. But Keyboard and Mouse, the ability to keep your PC relative through minor upgrades, and the general purpose functions make it a far superior choice. For most consumers you can subtract the base cost of the PC and monitor and only look at the cost of a mainstream graphics card. If more devs take Capcom's lead it's very possible the PC will replace consoles, not the other way around. » Login to reply to this  SuperG (22)   Sep 23, 2009 - 11:29 am Might be that PC is going strong in current gen hardware. While Console ar fixed and stuck in the R500 ATI, RSX 7seriesnV stuff. If console must run along a lot longer. PC get a lot stronger in spect. And with that attractive. It might be even so much that budged hardware even outclasse console. Wonder what budged DX11 line deliver on performance. » Login to reply to this  Synchronous Failure (102)    Sep 18, 2009 - 04:30 pm Well I'm not debating anything and I 100% agree with you. Unfortunately, a lot of companies don't see it that way (*cough* EA *cough*) so it is refreshing to see Capcom, a primarily console-first developer developing for the PC. » Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

jacobvandy (956)    Sep 18, 2009 - 01:27 pm

yes, LIVE is used for the multiplayer, and there are a bunch of achievements. » Login to reply to this  SpaceLord (38)   Sep 18, 2009 - 03:14 pm Well then I'm not gonna get this one, hate windows live and don't see the need for achievements and stuff like that. » Login to reply to this  LORD ORION (1335)    Sep 19, 2009 - 12:38 pm | Edited on Sep 19, 2009 - 12:45 pm Jacob, I think it is every reason not to use it. The service is crap. Here are huge problems I have noticed in the single game I have that has it. 1) Having to restart the entire game after an update several times in a row. 2) Having it unavailable means being unable to play, even single player. If you keep buying games that use it, the clueless execs will think that it is a good idea. Not only will they keep using it, but "improve" it too.(for the worst). I can't wait until I have a dozen different services on my desktop for each publisher. Let's see, games for windows, steam, star dock... etc.... I though we decided that crap like this is undesirable a decade ago? It works like this; I bought your game. I didn't give you permission to run a pipe into my compuiter to spam me. This is worse then the freeware crap that we all loathe, because I paid for a product and also got this "service" I don't want. » Login to reply to this  SpaceLord (38)   Sep 19, 2009 - 10:47 am I've used it some but I just can't stand it really, took me forever to start using steam and now I find it to be ok but GWL is just annoying and bugs me too much. Maybe when it gets to a nice low price I'll pick it up. » Login to reply to this  jacobvandy (956)    Sep 18, 2009 - 06:10 pm i'm not a huge fan of it either, but it's kinda silly to not play a good game just because of that, isn't it? » Login to reply to this

» Note: You need to be logged in to write a comment!