» Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

Yoshi (2319)    Sep 25, 2009 - 10:34 am

Not really it's an access point that is wireless N. Those are still pretty expensive with a retail of at least $80. » Login to reply to this  carlton (63)   Sep 25, 2009 - 09:12 pm Try $50. Stop riding Microsoft's jock already. » Login to reply to this  Yoshi (2319)    Oct 05, 2009 - 12:28 pm You find a Wireless N dual band access point for under $80 that isn't like used or an open box product and I will delete my post. Right now you really can't do it so expecting a Microsoft part to be a bit higher is not that bad. » Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

Labotomizer (1077)    Oct 01, 2009 - 06:55 pm

I don't think most people care about the cable behind the TV, I think most care about getting Cat 5e to behind the TV. If your house was pre-wired then of course you'd go hardwired, far more reliable anyway. However most residential is a huge pain to properly run cabling. » Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

Yoshi (2319)    Sep 23, 2009 - 06:16 pm

While you are at it you could say epic fail Sony for not adding wireless N to the PS3 Slim. I mean it would cost Sony like nothing to have done that. » Login to reply to this  Kromis (675)    Sep 24, 2009 - 12:05 am Yoshi, you are the fucking man! » Login to reply to this  Labotomizer (1077)    Oct 01, 2009 - 06:52 pm I'm just glad Microsoft did the smart thing and waited for N to become a standard. So many people jumped on the N bandwagon far too soon and it certainly wasn't ready. The early routers have terrible range and speeds don't get anywhere near what they claimed. I deployed the new Sonicwall SonicPoint N for the library, we can get signal all the way across the parking lot and across a major street in the Sonic parking lot. Pretty impressive. Of course, those just came out because they also waited for the spec to become finalized. I'm waiting on the new Linksys APs to come out in the next few weeks before I upgrade at home. » Login to reply to this  Yoshi (2319)    Sep 24, 2009 - 12:46 pm I liked the post since people are bashing Microsoft for having a $100 wireless N part you would pay about the same for wireless N on the PS3 and can not do it on the Wii because it lacks a ethernet port. With wireless N being 3 being 3 times faster and having a longer range I think I would pay for it rather than stick with G if I was to watch movies on the console. » Login to reply to this

» Note: You need to be logged in to write a comment!