» Login to reply to this

deimos47 (445)    Sep 28, 2009 - 06:01 pm

definetly not enough variety.. enemies/levels/gameplay. Seems every FPS these days is "super-hyper-acurate" with hordes of clone enemies. Last "original" gameplay I recall is "Prey" with the moonwalking on mini-world. » Login to reply to this

Labotomizer (1077)    Sep 28, 2009 - 10:44 am

These effects can often be done manually under DX9, same with most DX10 effects, but they are much easier and come at a far smaller performance cost under DX10/11. Additionally the tesselation is something you can't get on previous versions, which is why objects that are round actually look round. » Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

HercTNT (1)   Sep 26, 2009 - 10:05 am

And your not going to, not yet. Chances are most of the first games featuring DX11 were quickly patched to do so to be showcase titles. Did DX9 look better than DX8 at first..no. We go through this every cycle with DX10 being the acception, its hard to argue that DX10 did much of anything. » Login to reply to this  Synchronous Failure (194)    Sep 26, 2009 - 12:02 pm Thank you, Mr. Obvious. I'm not arguing any of that. I'm just stating that there isn't a difference between the shots so the whole "STALKER Call of Pripyat is a DX11 title" is a load of crap. But hold on, there was an appreciable difference between DX8 and DX9. Especially when it came to lighting. There was an even greater difference between DX7 and DX8 launch titles. » Login to reply to this

» Login to reply to this

» Note: You need to be logged in to write a comment!