

 Tiger Woods Out...Until August!
 |


| | | Posted by Alan Dang on Tuesday June 28, 2005 - 09:03 PM |
(Post a comment) » Eternal Battle Day 3: Stretching Your DollarThe truth is revealed. We’ve talked about building the no-budget desktop and the no-budget workstation. What about the best-bang-for-the-buck desktop and workstation? What about other power supplies or products? Your answers are in here. Welcome to Day 3 of FiringSquad’s Eternal Battle 2005. | Previous news article | Back to main news | Next news article  |

| You are viewing the comments as Guest and are limited to 10 messages per page. [Login] Not an FS Member? Register here, it's FREE! You will see more posts per page and you can filter out the Anonymous comments as well as enable the profanity filter. |
|
#12
|
Author:
|
Anonymous at 01:16pm 06/29/2005
|
|
Response to #11:
Reply to This
|
I don't agree entirely with your opinion. Even though a clash of the
titans might be fun read it probably won't hold any practical value
for majority of the users. On the other hand, even though the author
was talking about no budget systems, he did not go over the board
with price/value ratio..bringing to the table the best computer a
smart and rich consumer will go for. Anything over that will be an
overkill and waste of money...
|
| |
 |
|
#11
|
Author:
|
Anonymous at 12:03pm 06/29/2005
|
|
Comment:
Reply to This
|
I'm really quite dissapointed to read this installment of your 5
part article. I, and surely many other people have very _little_
interest in a 'medium-budget pc' versus a 'medium budget
workstation'.
When arbitarily choosing middle-spec cpu speeds etc. you take all
the 'umph' out of the article because its no longer top-technology
vs top-technology. Now I see why you went for sub-par HDD subsystems
in the no-budget systems.
I dont mean to be disrespectful, but it would have been a much
better idea not to do this kind of thing when initially promising a
titanic battle between PC technology vs Workstation technology.
|
| |
 |
|
#10
|
Author:
|
Jep4444 (View my Profile) at 08:15am 06/29/2005
|
|
Comment:
Reply to This
|
Why did you recomend an SLI board and then follow that up by
recomending an X800XL.
The MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum SLI is a poor choice for an SLI mobo due
to certain physical constraints that limit the motherboard(the
7800GTX is too long to fit into the second PCI-E slot for example.
This may not be a problem for more budget concious systems but if
theirs a budget than SLI isn't the best choice anyways. NF4 Ultra
would be a better choice anyways since SLI upgrading requires the
two cards to be physically the same and have the same BIOS meaning
adding a second card later can be a pain.
Lasty I think the HDD recomendation should note the availability of
NCQ in Seagate and Maxtor HDDs(not sure who else supports NCQ but i
know Western Digital doesn't) but NCQ would be worth it in almost
any system at almost no performance cost.
|
| |
 |
|
#9
|
Author:
|
Anonymous at 07:47am 06/29/2005
|
|
Response to #8:
Reply to This
|
Unlike #8, I thought the article was actually very interesting and
thought provoking. The title said stretching your dollar ... not el
cheapo PC.
|
| |
|
#8
|
Author:
|
Anonymous at 06:24am 06/29/2005
|
|
Comment:
Reply to This
|
This is complete garbage. You've taken a fine idea and flushed it
right down the toilet. You lied right on the @$%!&%! tease to this
article? You built a no-budget gaming pc and no-budget workstation?
That is h-o-r-s-e-s-h-i-t. You skimped out on parts on both
machines with claims of budget limitations.
I hope you get AIDS and are forced to walk around some geriatric
laden hospital in a thin hospital gown for the rest of your
cough-ridden, skin-peeling days.
|
| |
|
#7
|
Author:
|
Anonymous at 05:59am 06/29/2005
|
|
Comment:
Reply to This
|
On page 3 you have a bit of a grammatical error in the Random Fact
section.
"Pentium M’s are even better when you by undervolting
them"
|
| |
 |
|
#6
|
Author:
|
robvia (View my Profile) at 05:31am 06/29/2005
|
|
Comment:
Reply to This
|
A backup article would be a good idea. Not enough people
understand what is needed, and most gaming sites don't post that
type of article because they always reformat their test machines.
You could explain the importance of setting restore points, and
using M$ backup to save the system state to a folder on another
drive, it's about 500 megs.
Then you could talk about backing up important directories to DVDs.
Yes, it would take a Spindle to back up a full hard drive, but it's
better than losing everything.
Many kids talk about raid and ghosting, this is not a good backup
solution and people are just fooling themselves.
Raid doesn't work because if a drive becomes corrupted with a virus,
it will corrupt the other drive as well.
Ghosting doesn't work because you only get 1 copy of the OS.
Dat/DLT tapes work the best because you get multiple copies, the
down side is most can't afford it.
So a good article would be to take a system where you have the OS
and apps on your C drive, and data (music, pictures) on the D drive.
Set a restore point, back up the system state to the D drive, back
up both drives to DVDs, and pretend the C drive just got wasted.
Now bring it all back, reformatting C, reloading the OS, reloading
the DVD, and restoring the system state.
|
| |
 |
|
#5
|
Author:
|
GX-Alan at 05:12am 06/29/2005
|
|
Response to #4:
Reply to This
|
Thanks -- if you like these articles, forward the links to your
friends and make sure your friend forward the link to *their*
friends. One more surprise is coming...
Even RAID-0 systems shouldn't crash all the time -- if your RAID
system is unstable, the first culprit may be the power. With RAID,
you worry about mechanical failure of the HDD and with RAID-0 your
chance of losing data is twice as much as a single drive (only
because you have 2 drives now, and any one of those two can cause
trouble).
Our philosophy is that for home users/workstation users, regular
manual backups is something very do-able. You should always assume
that your HDD is unstable and make efforts to regularly back-up your
data. Sometimes it's as simple as emailing your important document
to your gmail account, etc.
|
| |
 |
|
#4
|
Author:
|
Anonymous at 03:02am 06/29/2005
|
|
Comment:
Reply to This
|
Great articles - keep going! :)
One question though, when the authour was talking about HDDs in the
first article, he said that a dream system would include 2 hdds in
Raid 0 setup + some more hdds for other stuff (like temp files,
swap)...so I was wondering what raid 0 hdds were for? :) Games
only?
Is it so dangerous to run OS and store files on raid 0 systems
because it crashes frequently?
|
| |
|
#3
|
Author:
|
GX-Alan at 10:50pm 06/28/2005
|
|
Response to #2:
Reply to This
|
Well this was supposed to build the article even more. The
benchmarks are coming in part 4, I guarantee that. The only other
hint I'll drop is that the surprises aren't all over...
|
| |
 Gigabyte P55 Lynnfield-ready Motherboard Roundup
 If you're in the market for a new P55 motherboard to go along with your new Lynnfield CPU you'll definitely want to check out today's article. Inside ... [+] (Comments) | Left 4 Dead 2 PC Review
 Valve says Left 4 Dead 2 contains so much new content, it's worthy of a sequel rather than DLC. Is this true or false? Judge for yourself in today's r... [+] (Comments) |
ATI Radeon 5970 Performance Preview
 After a 10-month hiatus, ATI's once again got the world's fastest graphics card. The Radeon 5970 fuses two RV870 chips onto one board for max performa... [+] (Comments) | Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 PC Review
 With no dedicated servers, no lean, and 18-player cap for multi, does Modern Warfare 2 for PC live up to its predecessors? Most of the reviews online ... [+] (Comments) |
Sapphire Radeon 5870 Vapor-X 1GB Review
 With its custom vapor chamber cooling+heatpipes and factory OC'ing, Sapphire's 5870 Vapor-X is targeted towards gamers looking for a 5870 card with a ... [+] (Comments) | Dragon Age Origins Review
 |
Phenom II Gets A New Revision: 125W AMD Phenom II X4 965 Performance Preview
 Promising lower power consumption, lower temps, and most importantly for enthusiasts, more OC'ing, AMD is back with a new CPU revision for the Phenom ... [+] (Comments) | Shattered Horizon Review
 FutureMark, well known for their popular 3DMark benchmarks, is venturing into new territory with Shattered Horizon. This multiplayer shooter is perhap... [+] (Comments) |
| AMD Athlon II X3 435/Athlon II X2 240e Performance Preview
 Today AMD is introducing 8 new Athlon II CPUs intended to service different segments of the budget CPU market. For HTPC users, new 45W dual, triple, a... [+] (Comments) | Borderlands PC Review
 Is it an RPG or is it an FPS? Borderlands blends the best elements of both in one entertaining package. Vandy has spent the past week playing the PC v... [+] (Comments) |
EVGA P55 FTW Review
 Looking for a good P55 motherboard to OC your CPU beyond 4GHz? If so, you may want to check out EVGA's P55 FTW. With its extra ATX12V connector, this ... [+] (Comments) | Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising Review
 While it's not the true sequel to Operation Flashpoint, Dragon Rising is billed as a modern tactical sim just like its predecessor. Does it live up to... [+] (Comments) |
ATI Radeon HD 5770/5750 Performance Preview
 With prices ranging from $109-$159, ATI's Radeon 5700 series of cards bring DX11 gaming to mainstream price points and usher in new levels of energy e... [+] (Comments) | Batman: Arkham Asylum PC Review
 Already a smash hit on consoles, the PC version of Batman: Arkham Asylum sports better graphics and support for NVIDIA technologies PhysX and 3D Visio... [+] (Comments) |
Batman: Arkham Asylum PhysX Features and Performance
 One eye candy feature PC users can enjoy over the console edition of Batman: AA is PhysX. Rocksteady's PhysX implementation is more than just tearing ... [+] (Comments) | Resident Evil 5 PC Review
 Sporting a new mercenaries mode with more enemies on screen, higher resolution DX10 graphics, and 3D Vision support, Resident Evil 5 is definitely bes... [+] (Comments) |
| More Hardware » | More Games » | Interviews » |

| | 




This Month
 October 1 - 31, 2009
 September 1 - 30, 2009
 August 1 - 31, 2009
 July 1 - 31, 2009
 June 1 - 30, 2009
 May 1 - 31, 2009
 April 1 - 30, 2009
 March 1 - 31, 2009
 February 1 - 28, 2009
 January 1 - 31, 2009
 December 1 - 31, 2008
 November 1 - 30, 2008

| 
 |
|