[ Print Article! ]

Darkest of Days Review and PhysX Performance
September 10, 2009 Jacob Vandy

Summary: 8monkey Labs time-shifting shooter, Darkest of Days, lets you experience the Civil War, both world wars, and more in an effort to save history as we know it. To up the immersion factor, the game also sports PhysX effects. Is the final product as cool as the concept though? Read vandy's take in today's review!


IntroductionPage:: ( 1 / 8 )

The first mainstream game developed by 8monkey Labs, Darkest of Days allows you to participate in some of the (surprise!) darkest days in American history. The game opens with the Battle of the Little Bighorn, where you get to fend off scores of Native American warriors at Custer’s last stand. Just after Custer is slain and moments before you are sure to share his fate, a large spherical portal appears Terminator-style, from which an oddly dressed person beckons you to come with him if you want to live.

[image]

<% print_image("01"); %><% print_image("02"); %><% print_image("03"); %>


You are Alexander Morris, an infantryman from 1876 who is now MIA and presumed deceased. You wake up a couple hundred years in the future in the custody of the organization that saved your life. KronoTek’s founder invented time travel, which is being used primarily for researching past mysteries and preserving history as it happened the first time. You find out from Mother, an unidentified second-in-command, that the good doctor has gone missing; nobody knows where or when he is. On top that, unexplained phenomenon have been occurring in the timeline and have the potential to completely change the present if left uncorrected. As it turns out, your unique condition in the historical record makes you a perfect candidate for top secret operations throughout a period of time spanning millennia. Are you up to the challenge?

[image]
<% print_image("04"); %><% print_image("05"); %><% print_image("06"); %>

I had a bad feeling about this game when I first started playing. I’ve played a lot of games in my time, I know the signs of a clunker, and this one was throwing up red flags all over the place. However, I wound up playing all the way through, so read on to find out whether or not Darkest of Days floats or sinks!









GameplayPage:: ( 2 / 8 )


It can be a boon in tight spots, especially when using a musket, but be careful not to jump the gun. There is also a serious glitch that you can exploit to make gunplay quite a bit easier: Switching weapons does not interrupt the process of reloading! You can fire one rifle, start reloading, switch to your second rifle, fire that one, and switch back to the first, which should have a new round loaded by then. It’s a little tricky and mostly unnecessary, but it will double your rate of fire in a pinch.

Another thing to watch out for is a blue aura surrounding some of the enemies you encounter. You are told in the extremely trite tutorial that these soldiers are supposed to survive, as if they are somehow essential to preserving history. You never know how or why that is… it’s just another of the many mysteries of this game’s story. Avoid killing them and you are rewarded with points you can spend upgrading your weapons, which I suppose is reason enough to do so. You can shoot them in the arm or leg to disable them, or use these little gizmos called chasers, which you throw in the general direction of a blue aura.

A chaser will seek out one of these VIPs, distracting them in the process, and then knocks them out with a zap. Meanwhile, friendly soldiers will slay blues just like anyone else, with no apparent repercussions. However, if you get sloppy and kill three of them in one level, you will be paid a visit by what are called the Opposition, another group of time traveling keepers of time. It seems you create a disturbance in the Force, as it were, which they detect and swoop in to put a stop to. If you wanted, I suppose you could purposely lure them to you in order to commandeer their futuristic weaponry.

[image]

<% print_image("07"); %><% print_image("08"); %><% print_image("09"); %>
On the topic of hi-tech fire sticks, one of the aspects of this game I enjoyed most was using modern and future weapons in historical settings. When you are tasked with single-handedly repelling a Confederate counter attack at Antietam, your fellow agent Dexter hands you an assault rifle! The AR-55, with its reflex sight and default magazine size of 40 rounds, cuts through rebel scum as easily as it does the corn stalks they hide behind.

I would’ve liked to see or hear some reaction to this juxtaposition, perhaps exclamations of terror or confusion from other soldiers directed at the destructive force I wielded, but no such thing occurs. Similarly outrageous and enjoyable are a laser guided rocket-grenade launcher and a sniper rifle that automatically creates a digital target that leads your quarry from several hundred meters away.

8monkey’s proprietary Marmoset engine was built specifically to allow rendering of very large numbers of NPCs at one time. This makes for some appropriately epic battles with up to several hundred combatants going at it all at once. Unfortunately, it is slightly obvious that compromises had to be made in terms of the qualities the NPCs display. Animations are awfully simplistic and have virtually no variation, as becomes abundantly clear when you sit through the benchmark test more than a few times. The AI is similarly bland, compelling them to employ not much more than the basest of strategies, like seeking cover and broad flanking. More often than not, enemies will haphazardly rush toward you or your allies, forsaking their firearm for a melee attack.

An overall deficiency of tactics makes sense for the Civil War, but to see Nazis or time-traveling super soldiers behaving similarly is quite a shame.

[image]
<% print_image("10"); %><% print_image("11"); %><% print_image("12"); %>

















Gameplay (Cont.)Page:: ( 3 / 8 )

Despite what the box blurb may lead you to believe, Darkest of Days is a very linear shooter. Sure, you fight on open fields instead of through tight corridors (most of the time), but fences, cliffs, and invisible walls are always making sure you follow the path the developers want you to. You can jump surprisingly high and far, but if you aren’t meant to cross that 2-foot rock wall, you won’t be able to. Rail sequences aren’t uncommon, not only on vehicles, but in line infantry formations, too. I have nothing against such elements when used sparingly, in fact it can be fun to just focus on hitting targets. Probably my favorite part of the Battle of Antietam was the automated marching through the cornfield to come face-to-face with about 100 constantly reinfored Confederates. Can you say “shooting gallery?”

[image]

<% print_image("13"); %><% print_image("14"); %><% print_image("15"); %>

Pertaining to the game’s storyline, or whatever resemblances thereof, most of the missions you take on are of an escorting nature. You have to find your man, highlighted with an orange glow, and then protect him while making your way to a safe area for extraction. Fortunately, it doesn’t seem that the VIPs can be harmed, which makes it easier because you only have to worry about keeping yourself alive. Speaking of which, there are some situations that initially led me to believe that I would be literally keeping myself alive, as in traveling back in time to provide covering fire for my past self. To my dismay, this was not the case. You see, some missions are revisited with a different point of view, whether to aid yourself in escaping from prison or to lend aid to the Germans when you had previously kicked their butt a little too hard on the side of the Russians. Remember, preserving history is KronoTek’s number one priority!


Darkest of Days’ control scheme could have been a whole lot better. Making good use of cover is very important in this game, which makes the omission of leaning all the more outrageous. Movement speed can be problematic, as you will likely find yourself moving too quickly by default. This can be directly attributed to poor translation from gamepad to keyboard. With no analog stick to govern how fast you’re going, it is difficult to strafe and shoot while aiming down the sights of your gun. Combined with the inability to lean, shooting from behind cover becomes a very dangerous game of “How lightly can you tap A and D?”

[image]
<% print_image("16"); %><% print_image("17"); %><% print_image("18"); %>





GraphicsPage:: ( 4 / 8 )
As you can probably tell from the screenshots, this game’s graphics aren’t anything to write home about. In many ways, any Source engine game since HL2: Lost Coast kicks Darkest of Days’ butt up and down the street. I’m willing to cut 8monkey some slack, though, since it is their first big project and they created the engine themselves.

I also have a theory that somebody on their staff suggested it might be easier to use PhysX effects to cover the environment in smoke and debris rather than make it look better on its own. But I’m not shallow, as long as it’s not an eye-sore, I don’t need fancy schmancy graphics in order to enjoy a game. The visuals are… sufficient. Although, sometimes the draw distance is not, which occasionally causes some objects (including enemy NPCs) to pop in and out of view.

[image]

<% print_image("19"); %><% print_image("20"); %><% print_image("21"); %>

The problem with the PhysX objects is that they don’t really blend in that well with the environment. Maybe it’s just because I’m not used to a bunch of leaves blowing around, or it might be that they need to fine tune the textures and shaders that are used. If you’re wondering why many of the images I took while playing seem to be a bit bare, it’s because the in-game screenshot function doesn’t pick up any of the PhysX-enabled objects for some reason! I had to go back with FRAPS to snag a few from the benchmark to show you what it looks like when you’re playing, even though they embellish the amount of effects a tad for the demo. On another note, I experienced a strange glitch in one of the Civil War levels where the fog and wind debris disappeared and reappeared randomly when looking in different directions. It only happened once though, so it’s not a huge deal.

[image]
<% print_image("22"); %><% print_image("23"); %><% print_image("24"); %>


Sound


The sound effects range from average to pretty ridiculous. One machinegun used by a heavy soldier from the future sounds like a mix between a lawnmower and a chainsaw, only twice as obnoxious. But hey, at least it’s easily recognizable, which is kind of a good thing since they are the toughest baddies you’ll come across. The music is unremarkable, as is becoming apparent to me now that I’m struggling to even remember what it sounded like. Let’s go with “run-of-the-mill war symphony.”

The voice talent is about what you’d expect from a no-name developer’s first foray into mainstream games. It’s not the worst acting I’ve ever heard, but it sure as heck won’t be winning any awards, either.

The thing that really bugged me throughout the entire game was that voices seem rather disembodied, as if they were inside your head. If that were true, in the case of some sort of communicator device your character wears, it’d be fine. However, they manage to also make them directional – move the mouse to turn your head and you can easily tell which direction the voice is coming from. Regardless, the voice you hear the most belongs to your partner, Dexter, and is very annoying because the volume level is too high and causes over-modulation. All of this culminates in breaking your immersion in the game; much like a director’s commentary track would prevent you from getting drawn into a movie.

[image]

<% print_image("25"); %><% print_image("26"); %><% print_image("27"); %>
















NVIDIA PhysX EffectsPage:: ( 5 / 8 )


It looks great, but other than largely obscuring your view of the surrounding area, it has little effect on gameplay. Debris does not pile up into dynamic obstacles or cover; it merely disappears after a few seconds, its point of origin undamaged. Wagons, fences, trees, hay stacks… none of them break apart, no matter how much you shoot them.

The first time I shot an enemy in the head and was rewarded with not only a shower of blood, but actual gibs hitting the ground around him, I thought it was so awesome. Upon further inspection, though, his head was still intact as he lay on the ground. Needless to say, I was quite disappointed. Even SiN Episodes: Emergence, a Source engine game from 3 years ago that very much lacked the capabilities PhysX offers, had heads that actually exploded!

[image]

<% print_image("28"); %><% print_image("29"); %><% print_image("30"); %>

Test Setup

Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 2.93GHz
GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB (G92) / GeForce GTX 275 896MB
4 GB DDR2-800 RAM
Windows 7 Ultimate RTM 64-bit (ForceWare 190.62)

There are three levels of PhysX in Darkest of Days: low, medium, and high. Low is for those of you without an NVIDIA GPU that is capable of hardware physics acceleration, using the CPU for basic effects that govern the likes of ragdolls and breakable crates. Medium enables fancier stuff like leaves that blow around freely in dynamic winds, along with other debris created by bullet impacts and explosions. Finally, high gives you more volumetric fog, dust, and smoke than you could ever want. I suspect it increases the volume of other effects, as well.

To test game performance, namely the impact that the PhysX effects can have on it, I ran a series of tests using different GPU configurations. First, I tested with my 8800 GTS 512, a midrange GPU that is now almost a couple years old. Next up was the GTX 275, a high-end card that was released earlier this year as a part of NVIDIA’s latest 200 series. Lastly, using an SLI-capable motherboard, I ran the tests with the both the GTX 275 and the 8800 GTS 512, the latter being dedicated solely to physics calculations.








PhysX Performance ResultsPage:: ( 6 / 8 )

All tests were run with the following settings:
- 1680x1050 resolution
- Very High detail
- 2x AA, 8x AF
- Ambient Occlusion ON

Low PhysX Settings

Darkest of Days PhysX Performance
GPUGPU PhysX OnGPU PhysX Off
GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB37.482739.9092
GeForce GTX 27554.370654.9473
GeForce 8800 GTS+GeForce GTX 27555.359555.7124


With no extra physics load on the GPU, the numbers are at their highest here. A large improvement is seen when upgrading from the 8800 GTS to the GTX 275, as expected. There is no real difference when adding the 8800 GTS as a dedicated PPU, since the Low setting has no hardware accelerated physics.


Medium PhysX Settings


Darkest of Days PhysX Performance
GPUGPU PhysX OnGPU PhysX Off
GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB27.91691.64627
GeForce GTX 27530.46141.68088
GeForce 8800 GTS+GeForce GTX 27532.54341.82384


This is where the grease hits the fire. Frame rates slow to a crawl when PhysX is run on the CPU versus GPU. Surprisingly enough, running the GeForce 8800 GTS as a dedicated PhysX processor alongside the GTX 275 only netted a 14% performance gain over the baseline 8800 GTS PhysX results with the GTS handling graphics and PhysX duties.

High PhysX Settings

Darkest of Days PhysX Performance
GPUGPU PhysX OnGPU PhysX Off
GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB17.14650.914922
GeForce GTX 27520.62380.849077
GeForce 8800 GTS+GeForce GTX 27522.90590.88165


Similar deviations are seen between the three setups, as all suffer another large decrease due to the increased load that the High PhysX setting provides. As I mentioned earlier, this benchmark test really lays the effects on thick, and performance is better during actual gameplay.




Ballistics ReportPage:: ( 7 / 8 )


Pros:

Civil War setting. The Civil War missions are fresh, fun, and fitting of the game engine’s capabilities.

Weapons variety: Using modern weapons in historic battles is as much of a blast as it is unfair to your enemies.

PhysX effects are a neat addition to the visuals. Make sure you have the hardware to support it, though.

Setting:A wide variety of period weapons and really cool futuristic ones help to keep things exciting. Upgrades give you the edge, even though you probably won’t need it.

This is the only game that lets you shoot Indians with a revolver, Nazis with a shotgun, and Roman warriors with a heat ray.


Cons:

Sounds and the way they are mixed are just dreadful.

The game is too ambitious for its own good. It tries to do too many things at once, instead of focusing on what it does well.

Outdated graphics engine. The graphics leave something to be desired. Maybe 8Monkey should travel back in time a few years and release the game when they would be impressive…

Environments are deceptively linear.

Consolitis rears its ugly head again. It is obvious that the controls have been limited to the number of buttons on an Xbox controller. An ability to lean is sorely missed in a game where cover is important. No quick saving, but at least the checkpoints are somewhat plentiful.

PhysX effects still seem very gimmicky. I eagerly await the game that takes them from an inherent selling-point to a real gameplay mechanic.

The story. It’s practically nonexistent, but what is there is just terrible. No real choices to be made.



The VerdictPage:: ( 8 / 8 )

<% print_image("32"); %><% print_image("33"); %>

It shouldn’t take anybody more than 10 hours to get through this. That is even exaggerated by the excessive amount of running around you often need to do between objectives and the completely irrelevant cut scenes, droning monologues, and other hackneyed story elements. The gameplay saves the day in spite of every other aspect of the game – sound, graphics, AI, controls, etc. – trying to drag it down.

It might be worth a rental, but I don’t know if you should run out and buy it unless you’re a Civil War buff. Actually, I think NVIDIA should just purchase the right to distribute it for free and use it to promote PhysX. It’d be nice to be able to download a tech demo that doubles as a half-decent game for once. With that said, you probably shouldn’t even bother if you have an ATI video card. It would be like eating cake without frosting when the cake isn’t even that good to begin with.



© Copyright 2003 FS Media, Inc.
[ Print Article! | Close Window ]